PDA

View Full Version : COP FOUND GUILTY!!!!!!


Zeb
05-15-2010, 09:48 AM
:clap\"
A jury found an Ottawa Hills police officer guilty Friday night of felonious assault with a firearms specification for a shooting during a traffic stop last year.

The case went to the jury on the fourth day of Officer Thomas White's trial for felonious assault with a firearms specification in the shooting of Michael McCloskey, Jr.

White, 27, showed no emotion, standing quietly with his attorney, Jerry Phillips, when the verdict was read about 7:20 p.m. The jury deliberated six hours on Friday before reaching a decision.

White was released on bond, pending sentencing set for 9 a.m. on June 21. White faces up to 11 years in prison.

Mr. Phillips would not comment and left the courtroom soon after the verdict was announced.

During closing arguments Friday morning, Jeff Lingo, an assistant Lucas County prosecutor, contended White had no justification for shooting — and permanently paralyzing — a man for a traffic violation.

"This case is not an indictment of all police officers," Mr. Lingo said. "This case is not an indictment of a police department. It is in fact a charge that resulted from the acts of a single police officer over a period of five minutes for which he acted alone and, the state feels, he should be held responsible."

Defense attorney Jerry Phillips told jurors that it made no difference whether Mr. McCloskey had committed a traffic violation or a criminal violation, whether he had a weapon or not. He said it made no difference whether Officer's White gunshot missed him, nicked him, or paralyzed him.

"Michael McCloskey was shot because White appropriately felt that either his life or the life of Officer [Christopher] Sargent was in danger at that moment," Mr. Phillips said.

He continually reminded jurors that they could not consider what happened in the early morning hours of May 23, 2009 with "20/20 vision of hindsight" but that they had to put themselves in the place of Officer White, considering only what he knew and saw and felt at the time.

justlyjohns
05-15-2010, 10:12 AM
an appropriate verdict, now the sentencing.

Shark Ethic
05-15-2010, 11:25 AM
I've never been part of a jury like this so I'm curious it says "The jury deliberated six hours on Friday" Is that a long time for a jury or is that normal?

jrdxx
05-15-2010, 12:54 PM
Hard to say, but but it is apparent that the jury didn't go into deliberations with all the jurors in agreement.

CKER
05-15-2010, 01:48 PM
Hard to say, but but it is apparent that the jury didn't go into deliberations with all the jurors in agreement.

We were in deliberation for 4.5 hours for the one i was on, that was an 80/20 split going in, me being part of the 20. 2 people could've cared less, and just wanted to go home and make dinner, 1 was a moron. I forget the rest, but the 20 percent won :). One less drunk driver on the road.

super3
05-15-2010, 01:54 PM
Hats off to the jurors and the prosecuter.

RiverRoadWarrior
05-15-2010, 04:39 PM
We all know he'll be free on bail pending an appeal. You know they're going to appeal it.

justlyjohns
05-16-2010, 10:48 AM
I don't know if in that state he can get an appeal bond but he will be coming up for sentencing next and will go to jail right then if he gets any time. If he does go to prison it won't be for the statute max, it will be the minimum the judge can get away with under their guidelines being a cop and having no prior record.

RiverRoadWarrior
05-16-2010, 11:13 AM
I'm sure a civil suit will follow now.

Shark Ethic
05-16-2010, 11:16 AM
We were in deliberation for 4.5 hours for the one i was on, that was an 80/20 split going in, me being part of the 20. 2 people could've cared less, and just wanted to go home and make dinner, 1 was a moron. I forget the rest, but the 20 percent won :). One less drunk driver on the road.


Hmm, so there was some doubt in the jury, one would assume. Either way they decided and the officer has to live with it. I was just wondering if it was a clear cut case or not.

FrankieG
05-17-2010, 10:34 AM
I guess i missed it, what state was this in?

Since i am a cop i'll throw my opinion in, even though most of the non police believe that we all stick togeather and there is a wall of blue... we realize that we are human and make mistakes and the last mistake we want to make is in a shoot/don't shoot situation.
my question would be who did the investigation? Was it a state or federal agency and if their findings were that it was not a justified shooting than there is really not much more to say... and while saying that i never trust jury's and their decisions.

well just my opinion..

Zeb
05-17-2010, 11:19 AM
Shooting took place in Ohio

super3
05-17-2010, 11:59 AM
And then they wonder why motorcyclist will sometimes make a run for it...... I'm going to find documented evidence of this case, then assuming I can ride again, if I ever run and get caught I will bring that evidence to court and tell the judge I ran because I feared for my life.......The preident has been set ;)

CodeNinja
05-17-2010, 12:04 PM
You know what really bothers me about this? I imagine that, the last time I got pulled over, I probably looked a lot like this guy. Look over my shoulder, see a cop, go for my pocket to get my license and registration out. I think next time I'll just sit there with my hands visible until the cop tells me to go for it.

FrankieG
05-17-2010, 01:13 PM
WOW, I located the story and read it, wow... first what stood out in my mind is that this officer was part time and he didn't have alot of experience. this was an unfortunate incident.
It appears the officer made a mistake.

Ex250Rider
05-17-2010, 02:01 PM
liberty and justice for all!

CodeNinja
05-17-2010, 02:21 PM
liberty and justice for all!

* - Not valid if you are poor, a minority, a non-minority, religious, non-religious, male, female, young, old, look different, or wear a funny hat. May be revoked without warning at any time upon labeling as a 'terrorist' , accusation thereof, or if you do something we don't approve of. All citizens are guilty of something so there is no presumption of innosence until it is proven in a court of law.



Not really, although sometimes it seems that way. Guess I'm getting cynical in my old age! :roll: